Part 1 – Overview, Introduction and Methodology
Overview
Training a quick and consistent contact is the goal of most
agility handlers. Today the strategies employed can be summed up as 2O2O, 4 on
the floor or running. Each strategy has its advantages and disadvantages. This
series of articles describe and summarise my method for training the former
while critiquing the method and comparing against the latter.
Introduction
Agility training methods are constantly evolving. As more
scientific methods (based on understanding of dog behaviours) are introduced,
contacts have become quicker and more consistent.
Like most people starting with a new dog, my objective was
to study the latest methods and work with a strategy which would offer highest
consistency and speed, coupled with resources available. The latter was an important
part of decision making. Factors such as equipment time, weather, time to train
and ground conditions through the year, all play a part in what can be
achieved.
Taking all the above in consideration I decided on a shaped
2O2O method with an objective of a <1.8 second (independent) dog walk. To
achieve this I also set myself a goal of 16 months from beginning to 1st
competition, coupled with that it would need constant refinement.
Methodology
From now on I will use the Dog Walk (DW) as the example,
although AF & SS remain relatively similar with minor adjustments.
There were 4 basic parts to training the DW:
- Entry
- Running
the planks to 90% completion
- The
stop (or contact)
- Alighting
The next articles will describe the sequential steps in #3
as this was taught at a foundation level. #2 was introduced at 8 months, #1 at 9
months and #4 at 14 months.